Skip to main content
Volatile hunts where the churn is: popular memes and high-velocity pairs whose pools pay the richest emissions precisely because providing liquidity to them is hard.

​
The thesis

Volatile assets generate outsized trading volume and venues pay outsized rewards to attract liquidity for them. Most LPs in these pools lose money to bad range placement and slow reactions. An agent that never sleeps, sizes ranges from measured behaviour, and rotates the moment yield migrates can capture what discretionary LPs leave on the table.

​
Temperament

  • Tighter management, faster rotation. Positions are watched and re-worked far more actively than Bluechip.
  • Emissions-first. The strategy is compensated for holding volatile inventory by harvest yield; harvests are frequent and compounded.
  • Ruthless about decay. When a pool’s emissions fade or its liquidity thins, the agent leaves. There is no loyalty to yesterday’s pool.

​
What you should expect

Larger drawdowns and larger recoveries than Bluechip. The underlying assets can fall much faster than any harvest can offset. Position values will swing with the market — the dashboard separates what the market did from what the strategy earned, so you always know which is which.
Volatile is sized for risk capital. If a 50% drawdown in the underlying assets would change your decisions, size accordingly or choose Bluechip.