Skip to main content
Concentrated liquidity has a cost baked into its geometry, and most LP marketing pretends otherwise. We’d rather you understand it.

​
The mechanism

A liquidity position automatically sells the asset that is rising and accumulates the one that is falling — that’s what providing liquidity is. When price leaves your range and the position is re-centred, that adverse inventory shift gets locked in. Do this over and over in a trending or whipsawing market and you accumulate a real, structural drag. It is the concentrated-liquidity cousin of impermanent loss, and it scales with volatility and with how often you rebalance.

​
The consequence

A concentrated-liquidity strategy only makes sense where yield is rich enough to outrun the drag. This single fact drives most of the system’s design:
  • The universe screen ranks pools by whether their sustained emissions and fees actually clear the bar — not by headline APR.
  • The rebalancing policy treats every re-centre as a cost to be justified, never a hygiene task. Whether, when and how far to re-centre is decided by rules tuned on live production data (closed source — this policy is a core part of what you’re paying the fee for).
  • Rebalancing costs are booked into strategy delta, so the drag is visible in your numbers rather than smuggled into “market movement.”

​
What you should take away

In quiet, range-bound markets the drag is small and the yield compounds. In violent trends it grows, and a pool can turn negative-sum for LPs even while emissions flow. The agent’s job is to notice that before it eats your yield — by widening, pausing, or rotating away — but no policy reduces the cost to zero. If someone tells you theirs does, they’re selling something.